Charlotte Iserbyt: The Miseducation of America

Dwarn

9/11 = Inside Job
5,687 Posts
39/M/PA

(1)

June 26 2012 1:08 AM QuickQuote

Quote

This is really crucial info that I don't think very many of you are aware of. Not only does she break down what the Reece Commission found out, in the 1950s, about the hidden activities of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace and the Ford Foundation, but also, she explains who "change agents" are and how they work to manufacture consent for the one-world government agenda.

VIDEO: Infowars: Charlotte Iserbyt: The Miseducation of America - Part I (74 minutes)
click here for link

Charlotte Thompson Iserbyt served as the head of policy at the Department of Education during the first administration of Ronald Reagan. While working there she discovered a long term strategic plan by the tax exempt foundations to transform America from a nation of rugged individualists and problem solvers to a country of servile, brainwashed minions who simply regurgitate whatever they're told.

Part one of our exclusive interview with Iserbyt breaks down how conditioning/training under a corporate agenda has replaced traditional education, leading to a deliberate dumbing down of Americans. Iserbyt further explains how Reagan signed agreements merging the U.S. and Soviet systems under the United Nations banner, turning over education and many other areas of public policy to global control.

This 74 minute exposé is a must-see for anyone who wants to truly know why the education system is deliberately crafted to produce human drones with no critical thinking whose only skills are to be subservient, trust authority and follow orders.

click here for link

Her book,'The Deliberate Dumbing Down of America' is free at

click here for link

Supporting document:
"Tax Exempt Foundations: The Enemy Within."
click here for link

An excerpt:

ED GRIFFIN: At what point in your career did you become connected with the Reece Committee?

NORMAN DODD: 1953.

ED GRIFFIN: And what was that capacity, sir?

NORMAN DODD: That was in the capacity of what they called Director of Research.

ED GRIFFIN: Can you tell us what the Reece Committee was attempting to do?

NORMAN DODD: Yes, I can tell you. It was operating and carrying out instructions embodied in a resolution passed by the House of Representatives, which was to investigate the activities of foundations as to whether or not these activities could justifiably be labeled un-American without, I might say, defining what they meant by "un-American". That was the resolution, and the committee had then the task of selecting a counsel, and the counsel in turn had the task of selecting a staff, and he had to have somebody who would direct the work of that staff, and that was what they meant by the Director of Research.

ED GRIFFIN: What were some of the details, the specifics that you told the Committee at that time?

NORMAN DODD: Well, Mr. Griffin, in that report I specifically, number one, defined what, to us, was meant by the phrase, "un-American." We defined that in our way as being a determination to effect changes in the country by unconstitutional means. We have plenty of constitutional procedures, assuming we wish to effect a change in the form of government and that sort of thing; and, therefore, any effort in that direction which did not avail itself of the procedures which were authorized by the Constitution could be justifiably be called un-American. That was the start of educating them up to that particular point. The next thing was to educate them as to the effect on the country as a whole of the activities of large, endowed foundations over the then-past forty years.

ED GRIFFIN: What was that effect?

NORMAN DODD: That effect was to orient our educational system away from support of the principles embodied in the Declaration of Independence and implemented in the Constitution; and the task now was the orientation of education away from these briefly stated principles and self-evident truths. That's what had been the effect of the wealth, which constituted the endowments of those foundations that had been in existence over the largest portion of this span of 50 years, and holding them responsible for this change. What we were able to bring forward, what we uncovered, was the determination of these large endowed foundations, through their trustees, to actually get control over the content of American education.

ED GRIFFIN: There's quite a bit of publicity given to your conversation with Rowan Gaither. Would you please tell us who he was and what was that conversation you had with him?

NORMAN DODD: Rowan Gaither was, at that time, president of the Ford Foundation. Mr. Gaither had sent for me when I found it convenient to be in New York, asked me to call upon him at his office, which I did. Upon arrival, after a few amenities, Mr. Gaither said: “Mr. Dodd, we've asked you to come up here today because we thought that possibly, off the record, you would tell us why the Congress is interested in the activities of foundations such as ourselves?” Before I could think of how I would reply to that statement, Mr. Gaither then went on voluntarily and said:
“Mr. Dodd, all of us who have a hand in the making of policies here have had experience either with the OSS during the war or the European Economic Administration after the war. We've had experience operating under directives, and these directives emanate and did emanate from the White House. Now, we still operate under just such directives. Would you like to know what the substance of these directives is?” I said, “Mr. Gaither, I’d like very much to know,” whereupon he made this statement to me: “Mr. Dodd, we are here to operate in response to similar directives, the substance of which is that we shall use our grant-making power so to alter life in the United States that it can be comfortably merged with the Soviet Union.” Well, parenthetically, Mr. Griffin, I nearly fell off the chair. I, of course didn't, but my response to Mr. Gaither then was: “Well, Mr. Gaither I can now answer your first question. You've forced the Congress of the United States to spend $150,000 to find out what you've just told me.” I said: “Of course, legally, you're entitled to make grants for this purpose, but I don't think you're entitled to withhold that information from the people of the country to whom you're indebted for your tax exemption, so why don't you tell the people of the country what you just told me?” And his answer was, “We would not think of doing any such thing.” So then I said, “Well, Mr. Gaither, obviously you've forced the Congress to spend this money in order to find out what you've just told me.”

Shostakovich

do svidaniya
5,067 Posts
30/M/MD

(7)

June 26 2012 1:14 AM QuickQuote

Quote

crunkmoose

FuckRandPaul!
23,637 Posts
62/M/MA

(9)

June 26 2012 11:18 AM QuickQuote

Quote

No one is going to read a word of that... and you know it, Dwarn. gee, wonder why.. oh yeah, because you behave like a loon so no one takes you seriously enough to actually read anything you post.

brian.

smackin bass
127,155 Posts
28/M/IL

(7)

June 26 2012 11:22 AM QuickQuote

Quote

Originally posted by: Shostakovich

Davey.

Iron Hog
38,312 Posts
27/M/NA

(11)

June 26 2012 12:03 PM QuickQuote

Quote

Who did 9/11?

Shostakovich

do svidaniya
5,067 Posts
30/M/MD

(7)

June 26 2012 12:09 PM QuickQuote

Quote

Brickhosue

destroytheweak

Time Husk
2,176 Posts
22/M/VA

June 26 2012 5:23 PM QuickQuote

Quote

I'm not going to sit here and say I read all of that shit because I've got better things to do on a beautiful summer day, but this lady is no joke. She has written a book about how the government has intentionally made public schooling a way to dumb down the population.

It would be easy to put her in the same group as reptillian overlord David Icke, if it wasn't for the fact that she was the head of policy for the Department of Education. She worked her way up and was apart of a white house administration. It's not like she's some loon who decided she wanted to make up some ridiculous conspiracy theory. The lady knows more about what she's talking about then anyone else that posts in this forum. Forget what was posted by Dwarn if you think he's a nutcase, but read her book or at least some of it and make your own conclusion.

Carlo_HC

hardcore for life
16,181 Posts
29/M/NA

(1)

June 27 2012 4:55 AM QuickQuote

Quote

Originally posted by: Davey.

Who did 9/11?

Originally posted by: Shostakovich

Brickhosue

crunkmoose

FuckRandPaul!
23,637 Posts
62/M/MA

(9)

June 27 2012 11:32 AM QuickQuote

Quote

Originally posted by: Carlo_HC

Originally posted by: Davey.

Who did 9/11?

Originally posted by: Shostakovich

Brickhosue

So thats why all those brick buildings got phone calls telling them not to come into work that day!

Man is Truth

sleeps on hills
5,435 Posts
31/M/NJ

(11)

June 28 2012 1:51 AM QuickQuote

Quote

but but but but

but but

the children!

How can we speak against public education?!

crunkmoose

FuckRandPaul!
23,637 Posts
62/M/MA

(9)

June 28 2012 11:01 AM QuickQuote

Quote

Originally posted by: Man is Truth

but but but but

but but

the children!

How can we speak against public education?!

Yeah, because no one here has ever expressed any dissatisfaction with public education as it is.

Hell, you and Dwarn are both great arguments against public education as it is now.

Man is Truth

sleeps on hills
5,435 Posts
31/M/NJ

(11)

June 30 2012 9:10 PM QuickQuote

Quote

the problem is that people hear the word "public education," which is a specific policy initiative entailing very specific political factions and unions and agendas, and just mingle and confuse that idea with the principle of learning, as though saying, "maintaining this lethargic and inert, self-serving, violently funded cartel apparatus to supervise and teach children is bullshit" is the same statement as, "we should not educate children."

Higgs boson

va-gine
5,899 Posts
29/F/PA

(6)

June 30 2012 10:35 PM QuickQuote

Quote

Man Is Truth do you ever reread what you have typed out before you post it or do you just enjoy structuring your run on sentences to sound even more insane than what you presumably are?

Also this is the first legit thing Dwarn has posted here. Weird.

Brett Weir

piss clams
40,341 Posts
28/M/CA

(5)

June 30 2012 10:53 PM QuickQuote

Quote

Originally posted by: destroytheweak

I'm not going to sit here and say I read all of that shit because I've got better things to do on a beautiful summer day, but this lady is no joke. She has written a book about how the government has intentionally made public schooling a way to dumb down the population.

It would be easy to put her in the same group as reptillian overlord David Icke, if it wasn't for the fact that she was the head of policy for the Department of Education. She worked her way up and was apart of a white house administration. It's not like she's some loon who decided she wanted to make up some ridiculous conspiracy theory. The lady knows more about what she's talking about then anyone else that posts in this forum. Forget what was posted by Dwarn if you think he's a nutcase, but read her book or at least some of it and make your own conclusion.

Treal talk

crunkmoose

FuckRandPaul!
23,637 Posts
62/M/MA

(9)

June 30 2012 10:59 PM QuickQuote

Quote

Originally posted by: Man is Truth

the problem is that people hear the word "public education," which is a specific policy initiative entailing very specific political factions and unions and agendas, and just mingle and confuse that idea with the principle of learning, as though saying, "maintaining this lethargic and inert, self-serving, violently funded cartel apparatus to supervise and teach children is bullshit" is the same statement as, "we should not educate children."

Why don't you try having a discussion with the people here who you are actually talking to, not just "people" in general... rather than just assuming we are all slack jawed yokels who need your profound knowledge to enlighten us to even the most simplistic criticisms of society and government.

Man is Truth

sleeps on hills
5,435 Posts
31/M/NJ

(11)

July 1 2012 12:42 AM QuickQuote

Quote

well I have discussed education before, and invariably it ends with you saying that I have no right to an opinion because a state institution that is admittedly not interested in teaching children how to operate as fully conscious individuals has not stamped a piece of paper that confirms my right to discuss them.

but we can try again-

we got mad people here alone with useless (as in not being valued at their present occupation) college degrees, with a desire to discuss things and share information- when kids who have no information yet sit in and hear these discussions, that is called a school. See if you can possibly accept the idea of schooling without the idea of monopolist violence permission certificates, then we can discuss educating people, mediocre joke motherfucker.

Listener Sign-Up

Band / Artist Sign-Up

Label / Management Sign-Up