Originally posted by: DickscraperOriginally posted by: -Jeremy-Originally posted by: Kermit Butts
I was referring to the genius that alluded to city of god being a piece of shit (a label which most people would attribute to films like the prom night remake).
It's for this same reason that I always found it irritating when people would refer to Donnie Darko as "the worst movie ever made" or "the biggest pile of shit i've ever seen". Is it a little overrated? Perhaps. Is it anywhere near being a "bad" movie, let alone one of the worst movies ever made? Definitely not.
i mean obviously it's nowhere near the worst movie ever made. but it most definitely is bad.
Originally posted by: jim-truth-
the coen brothers seriously piss me off with their movies from time to time.
i can use burn after reading and no country for old men as examples. in both of those movies there is huge buildup to scenes that you never see. in no country it was the confrontation at the hotel and in burn after reading it was the incident in the street with malkovich. both of which results in the death of a major character. in each case it's build up then cut to two guys talking about what happened.
Originally posted by: jim-truth-
the coen brothers seriously piss me off with their movies from time to time.
i can use burn after reading and no country for old men as examples. in both of those movies there is huge buildup to scenes that you never see. in no country it was the confrontation at the hotel and in burn after reading it was the incident in the street with malkovich. both of which results in the death of a major character. in each case it's build up then cut to two guys talking about what happened.
Originally posted by: adam.Originally posted by: jim-truth-
the coen brothers seriously piss me off with their movies from time to time.
i can use burn after reading and no country for old men as examples. in both of those movies there is huge buildup to scenes that you never see. in no country it was the confrontation at the hotel and in burn after reading it was the incident in the street with malkovich. both of which results in the death of a major character. in each case it's build up then cut to two guys talking about what happened.
Art.
Originally posted by: jim-truth-
the coen brothers seriously piss me off with their movies from time to time.
i can use burn after reading and no country for old men as examples. in both of those movies there is huge buildup to scenes that you never see. in no country it was the confrontation at the hotel and in burn after reading it was the incident in the street with malkovich. both of which results in the death of a major character. in each case it's build up then cut to two guys talking about what happened.
Originally posted by: mark devitoOriginally posted by: eddie.
the director's cut of alien3 isn't that intolerable.
smokin' aces was a lot of fun and is highly overlooked.
Smoking Aces is fucking awesome.
The Alien 3 directors cut is far superior to the original version and is also my favorite out of the entire series.
Originally posted by: Max SchreckOriginally posted by: mark devitoOriginally posted by: eddie.
the director's cut of alien3 isn't that intolerable.
smokin' aces was a lot of fun and is highly overlooked.
Smoking Aces is fucking awesome.
The Alien 3 directors cut is far superior to the original version and is also my favorite out of the entire series.
i actually liked alien3. i've noticed that a lot of people who have seen alien2 before alien1, don't like it, but people who have seen them in order either dislike it less or actually like it.