forum Politics and Society ›› >> ›› new reply Post Reply
Consider Me Dead

LaughingOnTheInsid
451 Posts
11/M/NV

offline 
April 13 2007 2:18 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
.
Kadesh
Kadesh
37,474 Posts
33/M/PA


offline     (26)
April 13 2007 2:21 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
.
Bill Mazeroski
8 Gold Gloves
1,315 Posts
36/M/DE


offline   (6)
April 13 2007 2:22 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
"I mean can you imagine pulling a bone out the ground after 68 million years and then getting intact protein sequences?"

you could make a better point by just photoshopping sun glasses on all the pictures.

"It's very, very, very controversial because most people have gone on record saying there's an absolute time limit to anything that's protein or DNA"

scientists will write and re-write volumes of non sence just so they
can make a ridiculous point.
Kadesh
Kadesh
37,474 Posts
33/M/PA


offline     (26)
April 13 2007 2:23 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
secondly :
" An adolescent female Tyrannosaurus rex died 68 million years ago, but its bones still contain intact soft tissue, including the oldest preserved proteins ever found, scientists say."

Raise your hand if you honestly think anything 68 million years old has the ability to still be soft.
coastal elite
hates chicken.
15,889 Posts
29/F/DC


offline   (1)
April 13 2007 2:23 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
Originally posted by:matt.

Wow. You know...chickens are mammals right? I would love to see the explanation and how that's possible.


Oh my god. I just had to quote this in case you edit it.
lottery hypnosis
Prof. Mammalchicke
2,064 Posts
11/M/PA


offline   (3)
April 13 2007 2:26 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
Originally posted by:Lauren from MD

Originally posted by:matt.

Wow. You know...chickens are mammals right? I would love to see the explanation and how that's possible.


Oh my god. I just had to quote this in case you edit it.





wow. just wow.
Kadesh
Kadesh
37,474 Posts
33/M/PA


offline     (26)
April 13 2007 2:26 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
Originally posted by:Bill Mazeroski

"It's very, very, very controversial because most people have gone on record saying there's an absolute time limit to anything that's protein or DNA"



Exactly my point. It's obvious that these proteins and this DNA is younger then scientists project. I'm just surprised that most people don't question their dating process.
Bill Mazeroski
8 Gold Gloves
1,315 Posts
36/M/DE


offline   (6)
April 13 2007 2:27 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
Originally posted by: Lauren from MD

Originally posted by:matt.

Wow. You know...chickens are mammals right? I would love to see the explanation and how that's possible.


Oh my god. I just had to quote this in case you edit it.


yeah, it really sucks he speaks on behalf of christians and creationists, and no one can back his side up well because athiests and agnostics are the majority here. his points and arguments seem to be lacking. points for effort though matt.
Kadesh
Kadesh
37,474 Posts
33/M/PA


offline     (26)
April 13 2007 2:29 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
Originally posted by:Lauren from MD

Originally posted by:matt.

Wow. You know...chickens are mammals right? I would love to see the explanation and how that's possible.


Oh my god. I just had to quote this in case you edit it.



....what's the problem? you don't know what a mammal is?

mam·mal (mām'əl) Pronunciation Key
n. Any of various warm-blooded vertebrate animals of the class Mammalia, including humans, characterized by a covering of hair on the skin and, in the female, milk-producing mammary glands for nourishing the young.
Bill Mazeroski
8 Gold Gloves
1,315 Posts
36/M/DE


offline   (6)
April 13 2007 2:31 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
dammit, stop being so wrong. chickens ain't got no tits.
Kadesh
Kadesh
37,474 Posts
33/M/PA


offline     (26)
April 13 2007 2:33 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
what is the classification of a chicken then? it's not a reptile, those are commonly cold blooded.
lottery hypnosis
Prof. Mammalchicke
2,064 Posts
11/M/PA


offline   (3)
April 13 2007 2:33 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
Originally posted by:Bill Mazeroski

"I mean can you imagine pulling a bone out the ground after 68 million years and then getting intact protein sequences?"

you could make a better point by just photoshopping sun glasses on all the pictures.

"It's very, very, very controversial because most people have gone on record saying there's an absolute time limit to anything that's protein or DNA"

scientists will write and re-write volumes of non sence just so they
can make a ridiculous point.





and in a thousand years when every species has been gene mapped and evolution is shown to the finest degree, you will still sound stupid.

i love how kids today are so proud of being ignorant.

also, exactly what was photoshopped? do you know what the journal science or AP are?
here's a hint: not mtv news.

"It's very, very, very controversial because most people have gone on record saying there's an absolute time limit to anything that's protein or DNA"

yes, that's why it's 'controversial' that they found something much older.

reading comprehension, ftw.
Kadesh
Kadesh
37,474 Posts
33/M/PA


offline     (26)
April 13 2007 2:36 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
^you have nothing good to say and you aren't helping in this conversation. you can shut up.
lottery hypnosis
Prof. Mammalchicke
2,064 Posts
11/M/PA


offline   (3)
April 13 2007 2:36 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
Originally posted by:matt.

Originally posted by:Lauren from MD

Originally posted by:matt.

Wow. You know...chickens are mammals right? I would love to see the explanation and how that's possible.


Oh my god. I just had to quote this in case you edit it.



....what's the problem? you don't know what a mammal is?

mam·mal (mām'əl) Pronunciation Key
n. Any of various warm-blooded vertebrate animals of the class Mammalia, including humans, characterized by a covering of hair on the skin and, in the female, milk-producing mammary glands for nourishing the young.





.....oh my god.........

and yet you feel qualified to argue about biological issues like evolution and stem cell research......christ.

"chicken.....the other mammal."
Kadesh
Kadesh
37,474 Posts
33/M/PA


offline     (26)
April 13 2007 2:40 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
Like I said, you have nothing positive to say at all. Since no one here has been able to properly classify a chicken so far, it's a simple mistake and shows no reason why I wouldn't know anything about biological issues or other evolutionary issues.
lottery hypnosis
Prof. Mammalchicke
2,064 Posts
11/M/PA


offline   (3)
April 13 2007 2:42 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
it shows every reason why.

it's like someone calling themselves qualified to work on cars not understanding why they shouldn't fill the gas tank up with water.
forum Politics and Society ›› >> ›› new reply Post Reply

Quick Reply - RE: >>

Connect with Facebook to comment: Login w/FB

or Sign up free! - or login:







Subject


wrap selection with italics
wrap selection with bold
insert less than symbol
insert greater than symbol


google image Insert Google Images
Share a Band



Your ad here?