forum Politics and Society ›› Will Paul Ryan be Romney's Viagra? ›› new reply Post Reply
da truth
Time Husk
1,392 Posts
113/


offline  mobile reply   (1)
August 15 2012 4:20 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
Originally posted by: lord sauron

Originally posted by: Dianana

Originally posted by: lord sauron

higgs boson is a dumb cunt, isn't she




No, she's not.

How about you contribute to the thread instead of being some anonymous shit talker.




nah, i'm good.

Brett Weir
piss clams
40,346 Posts
28/M/CA


offline   (5)
August 15 2012 6:12 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
Paul Ryans economic plan is basically: raise taxes on the middle class, cut them for the super rich, and then do nothing about the deficit. Gut Medicare and Social Security without fixing budget problems. Fucking LOL.
Brett Weir
piss clams
40,346 Posts
28/M/CA


offline   (5)
August 15 2012 6:48 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
oh I just read this thread, and it bums me out that somebody so smart can fall for the GOP scare tactics on something as successful and non burdensome as medicare. It is especially disheartening to hear the negative reaction to socialized medicine. The pre-existing condition pool to help those who can't get covered based on that is like 15 dollars a citizen to cover and people are STILL whining. Land of the selfish, straight up.
empireofcrime
alley lurker
44 Posts
31/M/KS


online 
August 15 2012 7:32 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
Originally posted by: Kermit Butts

oh I just read this thread, and it bums me out that somebody so smart can fall for the GOP scare tactics on something as successful and non burdensome as medicare. It is especially disheartening to hear the negative reaction to socialized medicine. The pre-existing condition pool to help those who can't get covered based on that is like 15 dollars a citizen to cover and people are STILL whining. Land of the selfish, straight up.



I know it's probably already been said but what depresses me about people like Paul Ryan who combine their religious faith with libertarianism/objectivism is that they can use two faces, one being the beaming face of Christianity to project charity and love to one and all and force ideas on people and the other one to be Ebeneezer Scrooge and hold tight onto every penny so much so that him and others like him would rather let infrastructure fail completely and everything be privatized because the invisible hand of the market(God?) will take care of the rest and they don't have to give money to "ingrates".
white trash dirt bag
pass the whore
2,061 Posts
30/M/NA


offline   (6)
August 15 2012 7:42 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
^christianity has a long history of exactly this kind of hypocrisy. in fact, when the romans adopted christianity, they were still practicing imperial genocide and slavery, and yet could feel good about themselves because they went to church and talked about being nice one day a week. the crusaders, the conquistadors, the inquisitors, the witch burners in europe and salem, the kkk, and even the mccarthyites and beyond have all carried on a very long tradition of calling themselves christian while behaving about as unchristlike as humanly possible.

not much has changed in posture, and yet to their credit, it is other, more sincere christians who have most often pointed this out throughout that history.

and blocking national health care may not seem comparable to the atrocities of the past at first glance, but when you consider that over 40,000 people without healthcare die each year of treatable illnesses in this country, the numbers at least are comparable, even if the action of their deaths seems more passive and innocuous.
white trash dirt bag
pass the whore
2,061 Posts
30/M/NA


offline   (6)
August 15 2012 7:57 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
Originally posted by: BRYANA


i'm not saying that it can't be done but there is a reason that the number of people opting to skip college and go into the workforce without a degree is rising.
.



it is no accident that the richest country in the world [us] still fails to be the most literate and educated per capita, while the countries that do hold that honor all have nationalized higher education where their best and brightest are encouraged to achieve regardless of family income level, rather than settle for a life far below their potential. their entire society benefits from their success, not just the individuals succeeding, because everyone wins when more people are better skilled and more knowledgeable at what they do.
Tim E. Husk
slavar som djur
18,783 Posts
47/M/NA


online   (1)
August 15 2012 8:27 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
Originally posted by: white trash dirt bag

Originally posted by: BRYANA


i'm not saying that it can't be done but there is a reason that the number of people opting to skip college and go into the workforce without a degree is rising.




it is no accident that the richest country in the world [us] still fails to be the most literate and educated per capita, while the countries that do hold that honor all have nationalized higher education where their best and brightest are encouraged to achieve regardless of family income level, rather than settle for a life far below their potential. their entire society benefits from their success, not just the individuals succeeding, because everyone wins when more people are better skilled and more knowledgeable at what they do.




We have ridiculous percentages of people attending college - more so than in most of the west, if I recall correctly - despite the lag in general education. I hope more and more people skip college for trades or other sectors, but WTDB is right that those who go to college need to be the best, not the wealthiest.
white trash dirt bag
pass the whore
2,061 Posts
30/M/NA


offline   (6)
August 15 2012 8:41 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
^anthropologist peter farb once postulated that it wasn't the individual geniuses that made the golden age of 5th century b.c. athens happen, but the evolution of a cultural infrastructure that allowed them to achieve and be elevated [echoing the more recent 'you didn't build that alone' comments of elizabeth warren via barack obama].

the point is that many of our best just happen to be born poor; that's just the cruel probabilities of nature and the genetic lottery. and the society that misses and thereby wastes its nacent geniuses suffers as a result. we are far less like 5th century b.c. athens and far more like 4th century a.d. rome.
empireofcrime
alley lurker
44 Posts
31/M/KS


online 
August 15 2012 9:04 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
Originally posted by: white trash dirt bag
the point is that many of our best just happen to be born poor; that's just the cruel probabilities of nature and the genetic lottery. and the society that misses and thereby wastes its nacent geniuses suffers as a result.



On a related note this makes me think of what George Carlin said about "pro life" attitudes. There's also the defense of of abortion destroying the next Mozart or scientist that cures cancer. Getting back to the point of education and healthcare, as is mentioned before the Christians are willing to turn their backs on the poor as soon as they are born and just trust(or be indifferent towards) any outcome beyond birth. As far as Ryan's libertarian beliefs, from what little reading I've done on it, it's amusing to note that Ayn Rand seemed to think very poorly of libertarians even though they took Objectivism and just shoehorned it into their way of thinking.
white trash dirt bag
pass the whore
2,061 Posts
30/M/NA


offline   (6)
August 15 2012 9:14 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
Originally posted by: barbarossa

Originally posted by: white trash dirt bag

Originally posted by: BRYANA.


i'm not saying that it can't be done but there is a reason that the number of people opting to skip college and go into the workforce without a degree is rising.




it is no accident that the richest country in the world [us] still fails to be the most literate and educated per capita, while the countries that do hold that honor all have nationalized higher education where their best and brightest are encouraged to achieve regardless of family income level, rather than settle for a life far below their potential. their entire society benefits from their success, not just the individuals succeeding, because everyone wins when more people are better skilled and more knowledgeable at what they do.




We have ridiculous percentages of people attending college - more so than in most of the west, if I recall correctly - despite the lag in general education. I hope more and more people skip college for trades or other sectors, but WTDB is right that those who go to college need to be the best, not the wealthiest.



yes, but you're right if you're implying that i also agree with the early communists that the more people that receive higher education the better, regardless of whether or not they are all geniuses. but where marx believed that all people deserved to enjoy beethoven and bach regardless of station or class, i believe that in addition, all people also deserve to be familiarized with contemporary science and all the other disciplines of what is generally regarded as your basic liberal arts university education, even if they choose non academic trades. [that was the original purpose of the liberal arts core curriculum in this country if i'm not mistaken.] we all benefit when even the servers at taco bell know a little bit about why they should wash their hands after taking a shit and don't just go through the motions halfassedly because they are supposed to. and as a capitalist, i believe that the often decried cost of such an open approach to higher education will one day be shown to be far, far less than the price we are already paying for all the effects of preventable ignorance at every level now.
crunkmoose
FuckRandPaul!
23,637 Posts
62/M/MA


offline   (9)
August 15 2012 9:26 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
Originally posted by: da truth

Originally posted by: babydaddy




Originally posted by: Higgs boson

Of course its not there for the poor, that was my entire point.

I dont know why people in this country start things with "its not perfect but..." and then they talk about how it is acceptable to be so flawed. We should strive for perfection in everything we do because it is us, the citizens that receive the end result.



And we shouldn't just scrap any and all programs that are not perfect... because nothing is ever perfect. In truth, many of our systems.. transportation, health care, education, workers rights, etc.. lag woefully behind those of other first world nations and while their wealthiest people may not be as well off as our wealthiest, they do generally have better, happier, less crime ridden societies with lower rates of most social ills.
Brett Weir
piss clams
40,346 Posts
28/M/CA


offline   (5)
August 15 2012 10:04 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
click here for link

for all the tax cryers
Tim E. Husk
slavar som djur
18,783 Posts
47/M/NA


online   (1)
August 15 2012 10:34 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
Originally posted by: white trash dirt bag

Originally posted by: barbarossa

Originally posted by: white trash dirt bag

Originally posted by: BRYANA


i'm not saying that it can't be done but there is a reason that the number of people opting to skip college and go into the workforce without a degree is rising.




it is no accident that the richest country in the world [us] still fails to be the most literate and educated per capita, while the countries that do hold that honor all have nationalized higher education where their best and brightest are encouraged to achieve regardless of family income level, rather than settle for a life far below their potential. their entire society benefits from their success, not just the individuals succeeding, because everyone wins when more people are better skilled and more knowledgeable at what they do.




We have ridiculous percentages of people attending college - more so than in most of the west, if I recall correctly - despite the lag in general education. I hope more and more people skip college for trades or other sectors, but WTDB is right that those who go to college need to be the best, not the wealthiest.



yes, but you're right if you're implying that i also agree with the early communists that the more people that receive higher education the better, regardless of whether or not they are all geniuses. but where marx believed that all people deserved to enjoy beethoven and bach regardless of station or class, i believe that in addition, all people also deserve to be familiarized with contemporary science and all the other disciplines of what is generally regarded as your basic liberal arts university education, even if they choose non academic trades. [that was the original purpose of the liberal arts core curriculum in this country if i'm not mistaken.] we all benefit when even the servers at taco bell know a little bit about why they should wash their hands after taking a shit and don't just do it halfassedly because they are supposed to. and as a capitalist, i believe that the often decried cost of such an open approach to higher education will one day be shown to be far less than the price we are already paying for all the effects of preventable ignorance at every level.



Yep. I was agreeing with you before and even more so now.
crunkmoose
FuckRandPaul!
23,637 Posts
62/M/MA


offline   (9)
August 22 2012 10:30 AM   QuickQuote Quote  
Our problem isn't too many people with an education... its education being too damned expensive and wages being too damned low while money is siphoned away from wages for most workers to pay multi-million dollar pay, perks, and bonuses (that aren't even bonuses now but part of wages) to the people at the top and to make middle-men like Romney and the bankers that got us into this whole mortgage crisis incredibly wealthy. Adam Smith would say, and I would agree.. that we suffer from too many people and corporations making money... huge amounts of money.. without providing any tangible goods or services except to help us afford or access other goods or services provided by other people or corporations.
empireofcrime
alley lurker
44 Posts
31/M/KS


online 
August 30 2012 12:59 PM   QuickQuote Quote  
Fox News article about Paul Ryan's speech at the RNC being riddled with lies and being absent of his extremist views, despite the fact that he projects such a winning personality:

Fact: While Ryan tried to pin the downgrade of the United States’ credit rating on spending under President Obama, the credit rating was actually downgraded because Republicans threatened not to raise the debt ceiling.

Fact: While Ryan blamed President Obama for the shut down of a GM plant in Janesville, Wisconsin, the plant was actually closed under President George W. Bush. Ryan actually asked for federal spending to save the plant, while Romney has criticized the auto industry bailout that President Obama ultimately enacted to prevent other plants from closing.

Fact: Though Ryan insisted that President Obama wants to give all the credit for private sector success to government, that isn't what the president said. Period.



Ryan didn’t mention his extremist stance on banning all abortions with no exception for rape or incest, a stance that is out of touch with 75% of American voters.

Ryan didn’t mention his previous plan to hand over Social Security to Wall Street.

Ryan didn’t mention his numerous votes to raise spending and balloon the deficit when George W. Bush was president.

Ryan didn’t mention how his budget would eviscerate programs that help the poor and raise taxes on 95% of Americans in order to cut taxes for millionaires and billionaires even further and increase — yes, increase —the deficit.




click here for link
forum Politics and Society ›› Will Paul Ryan be Romney's Viagra? ›› new reply Post Reply

Quick Reply - RE: Will Paul Ryan be Romney's Viagra?

Connect with Facebook to comment: Login w/FB

or Sign up free! - or login:







Subject


wrap selection with italics
wrap selection with bold
insert less than symbol
insert greater than symbol


google image Insert Google Images
Share a Band